Does anyone know whether we are totally injury free? Or whether we picked up injuries over the pre-season in training or in the Widnes game? I wouldnt be starting anyone with even a slight twinge (Other than say Briers) with the strength of the squad we have this year.
Higham not a patch on Clarke, proof at Widnes last week! Sorry to Riley but far too much quality in the backs to include him and there's nothing he can bring to the team from the bench! Harrison as a back row because I believe we've got enough ballplayers on the park, so make the pack even bigger! Coops has to step up and prove himself this year if he wants to establish that bench spot as his!
Do we really have strength in depth. What i mean is are the younger players ready for the intensity of SL.I know some lads have a season in the championship on dual registration.But in SL you will get find out.
Quotejdrocket="jdrocket"i would probably agree with that.
Maybe Riley in for Bridge and more it in the obvious fashion.
Could have Bridge on the bench in place of Grix.'"
I think Bridge on his day is a class act and having him in our sides offers alot of platforms, King on the wing for one. Bridge is very underrated and has an awesome side step. Also Riley, can often be critised for coming out of the line too early, and against attacking teams such as Huddersfield, I'm afriad that risk can't be taken for me.
Quotejdrocket="jdrocket"I would be tempted to move Clarke in for Myler later in the year.'"
Why?
Quotejdrocket="jdrocket"And as usual as much as we need a Micky Higham in the team. I don't rate him too highly. Would prefer almost anyone to him.'"
Like Rogues' has said he's the ultimate oxymoron. On his day he's brilliant, see; Bradford away and Huddersfield in the Play Offs, both last year. However, at times, his passes from dummy half can be as accurate as a blind man playing darts.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
