|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21691 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| REDWHITEANDBLUE:PopTart:PopTart:Butcher:PopTart:
I'd have Vagana on the bench so we have some impact.
Trouble is, who would you start? Croft? Would like to see Lingard play good minutes but I wouldn’t start him against Sue and Warea-Hargreaves. If it weren’t for last weekend, I’d be writing this game off, but with this team who knows? Based on what I've seen I'd start Croft. It's ridiculous he's playing prop but he did OK.No matter who it is is going to find it tough against Rovers front row but I think Croft is more likely to handle it. Lingard is in the academy team so we are going with a serious lack of middles. He is in both squads He's in the academy team, not the squad
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21691 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| It's a pretty clear rule and there to protect players. Usually get a ban for it. Pretty silly considering this was his first day back for a while.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5080 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21691 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| I need to look at that again then. The only way it gets changed to an A is if he didn't actually touch him.
I've no problem with Horne getting his. Partly because he did it and partly because it's triggered the Cas fans saying the RFL are out to get them.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1410 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The A is for the head contact, the E was 'not proven' on the report, not 'not guilty' - his story was convincing.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5903 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'm not sure how it was not proven, I watched it at the time and there's a small video of the incident when it came out. and it's blatant that he laid hands on a downed Jowitt, can't see what he can say in defence tbh. Then again Hull KR got that Prop off for spitting the other week didn't they, when it was caught on video? Some people on socials couldn't see what he did wrong and even accused Max of faking injury, which is ridiculous, especially after last week when he had his nose split open at the start of the game after a big hit to the face that went unpunished and got up and played the ball, but so many fans don't know the rules that when a player goes down, you don't lay a finger on them, no matter what they believe. This incident on appearance is on the less serious side of things but the fact is Martin did tug on Max's jersey when he was face down after the hit, to encourage him to get up, they usually get a ban, no debate.
|
|
|
 |
|